In deze aflevering spreken Matanja รฉn Willem met mr. dr. Gerrieke Bouwman over haar proefschrift, waarin zij onderzoek deed naar de scheidslijnen tussen juridische instrumenten voor de uitbesteding van zorg. De discussie gaat in op haar aanbevelingen, het ASADE...
Summary of the Case Cโ285/18 Irgita and the national courtโs response to the CJEUโs judgement Authored by: PhD student Magdalena Maria Socha Reviewed by: Associate Professor Willem Janssen Introduction In the Irgita[1] case, the Court of Justice of the European...
In the C-385/02, COMMISSION V ITALY, the CJEU extensively answered questions concerning the contracting authorities' discretion when awarding a contract directly. In doing so, the CJEU stipulated conditions to be satisfied when a direct award is chosen due to technical reasons. Furthermore, it showcased the judicial approach to determining whether the state of urgency is actual and grounded or purely illusory. Lastly, this judgment reaffirms that the Public Works Contracts Directive derogating provisions are to be interpreted strictly.
On September 9th, 2022, Public procurement professionals from Denmark and from around Europe gathered to hear more about the PurpLE project and give their feedback on the planned scope of the research that will be thoroughly researched during the next three years.
Anne Fischer, oud-voorzitter, spreekt met Matanja over de Commissie van Aanbestedingsexperts. Ze blikken terug, maar kijken ook vooruit naar de nieuwe rol die de Commissie gaat vervullen. In deze podcast komen verschillende adviezen van de Commissie voorbij en...
In this episode, Marta, Willem, and their guest, dr.ย Rasmus Horskjรฆr Nielsenย discuss award criteria and evaluation methods in public procurements. In doing so, Rasmus explains the difference between relevant and controllable competition concepts. In addition, they debate whether there is such a thing as objective criteria For the dessert, you can hear what Rasmus would do differently if he did his PhD again.ย
In this episode, Marta and Willem, along with their guest Prof. Ole Hansen discuss the modification of construction contracts. They explore why in practice, there is often a need for modification in construction contracts and how it is addressed with reference to principles of loyalty and reciprocity. They point out that the rules concerning modification of public contracts do not always represent the commercial reality but merely focus on what is promised in the tender. For the dessert, they argue contract law perspective in public contracts is welcomed.
In deze aflevering spreekt Willem met prof.Fredo Schotanus die recentelijk zijn oratie hield aan de Universiteit Utrecht.. Ze spreken van het verleden, heden en de toekomst. Waarom begint een betere wereld eigenlijk bij publieke inkoop? Hoe kunnen we de...
In deze aflevering spreekt Willem met Jรธrgen den Houting (Rozemond Advocaten) over abnormaal lage inschrijvingen als duurzaamheidsverplichting. Wanneer is sprake van een abnormaal lage inschrijving? Welke rol speelt duurzaamheid als verplichting in dit kader? Hoe...
In this episode, Willem & Marta welcome guest Dr. Alexandra Andov and discuss the topic of digital technologies and contract management. They explore the distinctions between contract formation and contract execution, as well as the use of digital technologies in the management phase, such as negotiation, electronic signatures, computational contracts, and transparency. For dessert, they open up about their own experience in becoming Associate professors by sharing one aspect that has changed since.